|
Everybody trusts Google - the name has become
synonymous with web searches and contextual advertising, but mounting
evidence leads some dissenters to ask the
This is also the contention of a new short film that attempts to
unsettle your assumptions about everyone's favourite web monopoly:
Google.
Take Google Mail for instance
- it is open knowledge that Gmail scans the contents of both incoming
and outgoing mail, so that well targeted contextual advertising can be
placed alongside your inbox. Gmail has been enormously popular, given
that it is free, well featured and packs over two gigabytes of storage.
But can you be one hundred percent certain that the mails scanned for
the purposes of ad placement are not used for other purposes?
In this guide to Googlephobia, I have gathered a
range of questions that are starting to be asked about the possible
negative impact the web juggernaut might have on your life. In an age
in which governments are attempting closer and closer surveillance and
control of their citizens, can a private company be trusted to keep
private information confidential?
Many would argue not, and yet many people persist
in using email, online spreadsheets and documents, and web searches
that could well be used against them at a later date. That's right,
even your web searches are stored deep down in the Google vaults, ready
to pulled up and examined at a moment's notice.
Capping this overview of Google's less sunny side is the short film Master Plan, complete with a transcription by Executive Editor Livia Iacolare.
So sit back, survey the landscape, and decide for yourself if you have reason to be afraid. Here are the details:
Google and big brother
In trusting Google
as your primary source of search information, or as an email, news, and
even web application provider, how much are you exposing yourself to
surveillance and possible manipulation? Just what information does
Google have, and what are they willing to do with it?
Serge Thibodeau at Rank For Sales notes that:
''...Google does record and store, as no doubt
do other search engines, by individual details of everything searched
through the Google engine.
This may be released where legally demanded or to satisfy national security or other state interests...''
In other words
should you be even so much as suspected of something illegal or of
concern to government bodies, Google will happily oblige said bodies
with full details of all of the searches you have run, and where they
took you. This all comes down to how far you trust your government.
When Adam L. Penenberg researched Google for his Mother Jones article on the subject
he directly questioned a Google official on the point of where the
company stands with regards to handing out confidential information:
''I asked her if the company had ever been
subpoenaed for user records, and whether it had complied. She said yes,
but wouldn’t comment on how many times. Google’s website says that as a
matter of policy the company does “not publicly discuss the nature,
number or specifics of law enforcement requests.”
So can you trust Google only as far as you can trust the
Bush administration? “I don’t know,” Wong replied. “I’ve never been
asked that question before.”''
But Google's complicity goes beyond subpoenas, according to ex-CIA intelligence agent Robert David Steele. Alex Jones at Prison Planet that:
''Steele raised eyebrows when he confirmed from
his contacts within the CIA and Google that Google was working in
tandem with "the agency," a claim made especially volatile by the fact
that Google was recently caught censoring Alex Jones' Terror Storm and has targeted other websites for blackout in the past.
"I think that Google has made a very important strategic
mistake in dealing with the secret elements of the U.S. government -
that is a huge mistake and I'm hoping they'll work their way out of it
and basically cut that relationship off," said the ex-CIA man.''
If Google is indeed in the pockets of shady
intelligence agencies, how far can you truly trust them to keep your
confidential data to themselves, and not turn it over at the drop of a
hat?
'Okay', you might say, 'but I have nothing to hide. The only people
that this is going to worry are terrorists and pedophiles'. But whether
you have nothing to hide or not, what is it stake here is a matter of
civil liberties, the right to privacy and the possibility of state
control and surveillance beyond anything known before. We are looking
at the possibility of a huge escalation in the erosion of our personal
freedom and privacy, beyond any security risks that might come about as
a consequence.
But that's not all.
Google everything
Google being in bed with big brother is a scary
thought, but it isn't such a monumental task to just switch to other
services if it concerns you too much. But there are those that suggest
that there may be little in the way of an alternative in the coming
years, as Google's master plan would seem to involve constant expansion
and the creation of a monopolistic empire that ties up the web,
telecommunications and television all in one. Where do you turn when
everything has a Google badge on it?
Robert Cringely over at I, Cringely
details this disturbing possibility - the idea that Google is looking
to create a total monopoly not just on the web services that we use,
but also our phones and televisions. In Cringely's discussion of Google's monopolistic masterplan
he details the fact that Google controls more network fiber than any
other organization, and that it is buying up data centers by the dozen
across America. 'So what?' you might ask, but as Cringely goes on to
argue, the implications are much graver than they might first look.
Internet use is changing rapidly. As the web moves
from being a static medium of words and the occasional picture towards
a dynamic medium stuffed full of video and audio, ISPs are facing a big
challenge in terms of keeping up with users bandwidth needs. In the
next few years the average web user is going to shift from using one or
two gigabytes of bandwidth a month, to using the same amount in the
average day. For the ISPs this means a huge increase in the bandwidth
they are going to be serving up.
Bandwidth, of course, lies in the hands of those who control the
network fiber, and increasingly this is going to mean Google. The
consequences are simple:
''We won't know if we're accessing the Internet
or Google and for all practical purposes it won't matter. Google will
become our phone company, our cable company, our stereo system and our
digital video recorder. Soon we won't be able to live without Google,
which will have marginalized the ISPs and assumed most of the market
capitalization of all the service providers it has undermined -- about
$1 trillion in all -- which places today's $500 Google share price
about eight times too low.''
So, regardless of whether you trust the Google
empire or not, chances are you are not going to have much of choice
when it comes to going through them if you want to access the Internet,
your phone, or television content.
Masterplan
Posing these questions with panache and style, the short film Master Plan
pushes Googlephobia a step further, throwing up questions as to
Google's dicing with DNA, and relationship with the CIA. This student
film, put together by Olan Halici and Jurgen Mayer for their Bachelor's
thesis, raises the bar and dares to ask the questions most of us would
rather not think about:
Master Plan complete transcript
Google is the most powerful search engine on Earth.
Today, billions of users google for any kind of information. A former student’s project, now rules the World Wide Web. In 1997, Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed the so called “page rank”: a complex mathematical algorithm that ranks websites by their relevance.
This groundbreaking invention profoundly transformed access to information.
Google rapidly became the first choice for internet search. But,
this was just the beginning. Today, Google ends huge profits by
dominating online advertising; it is well on the way of becoming the
most valuable company on the global market. But it isn’t just about
money; these men pursue a great vision, a google master plan.
Any kind of information will be accessible to anybody controlled by Google itself, with the credo, “Don’t be evil”.
New features and products are constantly flying out of the Googleplex,
all for free. Don’t you worry about your privacy? A perfect blend of
software and hardware, called Googleware gives the company more
computing power than anyone else.
Google stores the entire known web in its giant database, and there
is more. Gmail offers 2.7 GB of free storage; it’s no secret. All your
mails - including received mails from your friends - are scanned.
Google is methodically collecting personal data in many more ways using
cookies and account information merely to offer relevant text ads.
Google can create incredibly detailed dossiers on everyone of us. A
former CIA agent claims that Google is cooperating under cover with the
U.S government including the CIA. Through appearing to simply want the
best for its users, Google has already begun to expand its online
domination.
Total control, and not merely on the web. Google is conducting
research in the fields of molecular biology and genetics. What if
Google had an entire file on you? Even including your entire genetic
data? Every human being would become completely transparent.
What do you think? Does Google really worry about our privacy?
Conclusions
As Web 2.0 evolves people are increasingly
switching their work-based and personal communications to online
applications, such as those offered by Google. In so doing, you can
afford yourself new freedoms - the freedom to access our information
regardless of where you are in the world, the freedom to collaborate
with others from remote locations, the freedom to forget about how much
space you have left on your hard drive or where you put that elusive
file.
But in reaping the benefits of these new freedoms,
you also put yourself at risk of being spied on, reported on and sold
down the line by companies that will always put the bottom line before
their customers. As Google grows from strength to strength as a
provider of web services and applications, but also as an owner of all
important bandwidth, it would make sense to take stock of their growing
monopoly and consider the consequences of the deal you enter into when
you make use of their free software.
Google, as a leader in the Web 2.0 landscape, is all about
facilitating communication and the free flow of information. But where
is all of the information flowing to, and is it always to your benefit?
Or that of those who would control and catalogue our everyday lives?
While sincerely hoping that this isn't the case, it would be wise to allow for the possibility in our day to day actions online.
Additonal resources
If you want to read more on the subject of Google and its master plan, you might want to visit the following websites:
|